1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlabodo [156]
3 years ago
5

Who was allowed to rule Rome and establish an empire in place of the Roman Republic?

History
2 answers:
Elina [12.6K]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is b Caesar Augustus

Schach [20]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Caesar Augustus

Explanation:

Octavian in 29 BC declared himself Roman emperor, assuming the name of Caesar Augustus. Under his rule, the Roman Empire became an austere and centrally controlled monarchy. With it, also the Latin language and the Roman alphabet became standard for the whole Europe. Although Rome was already an empire before Octavian became Caesar Augustus, it fell to him to proclaim "the" Roman Empire. He was also the one who ruled during the period when Pax Romana (the peace of Rome) reigned over the whole "known world."

You might be interested in
Name four new states that were established as a result of anti-imperial resistance movements.
djverab [1.8K]
Some examples of states that developed at the edges of existing empires between 1750 and 1900 were the Cherokee nation, Siam, Hawai'i, and the Zulu Kingdom.

I hope this is what you were asking for. :)
6 0
3 years ago
How did semi democratic governments emerge in some of the greek city-states?
Vika [28.1K]
<span>Some of the citizens (Solon would be a good example) were able to break the hold of the aristocracy in Athena, and set up a more democratic system than was in place. He was able to expand access to the Assembly to all citizens and gave more of those citizens the ability to become members.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What was the main goal of the north during the civil war?
KatRina [158]
1)blockade all ports
2)gain control of Mississippi river
3)capture richmond (the south s/confederate capital)
7 0
3 years ago
URGENT PLEASE HELP!!!! GIVING BRAINLIEST!! If you answer this correctly ill answer some of your questions you have posted! (43pt
rosijanka [135]

Answer:

Soldier newspapers are a massive, yet little used primary source of the First World War. They were read and written by the almost universally literate men at or near the front in the French, British, and German armies. Although they were shaped by both official censorship as well as powerful self-censorship, these newspapers were popular. Importantly, they were purchased by a soldier audience seeking both reassurance and justification. Each army found itself in a different context. Although each set of newspapers depicts elements of a universal experience for all soldiers, they also unsurprisingly indicate the distinct national experiences of each army.

The newspapers created by and for soldiers, at or near the front, in the First World War (WWI), represent the single greatest shared print discourse of the war.The many millions of soldiers’ letters, while often using the language of this shared discourse, were nevertheless private and almost always intended for a non-military audience. Soldier newspapers, however, were written for – and shared among – a massive, yet distinct community of (almost solely) men seeking daily justification and motivation for – and an understanding of – their often extreme circumstances. These were "club newsletters," in a manner of speaking. Both the authors and the readers were members of the same club, away from home, every one of them familiar with the threat of mortal danger. Like letters, newspapers were the victim of both official and self-censorship, and like letters they must always be read with a critical eye. But they were enormously popular and were read (or read aloud and listened to) by millions. Therefore, they cannot be dismissed as mere propaganda. They function as lenses through which one sees elements of the daily life of soldiers, catches glimpses of humour, and beholds visions of women (both loyally on the home front and not so "loyally" behind the lines). But interestingly, for the most part in these pages there are no depictions of the enemy, at least not the portrayals endorsed by home front propaganda. Finally, the similarities and differences between the newspapers of the German, French and British armies illustrate the many ways in which the soldiers of each nation participated in the same war....

6 0
3 years ago
The americans formed a republic, or a government in which people rule in what way
alina1380 [7]
The Americans formed a republic, or a government in which people rule through elected representatives. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was most responsible for the victory of yorktown?
    15·1 answer
  • How did historians from the 1970 and 1990s view how FDR handled the Great Depression in the 1930s
    6·1 answer
  • What looks like Gandhi's flip flop?
    11·2 answers
  • Which caused serious conflict between Native Americans and colonists?
    7·1 answer
  • What is a female part of a plant called
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following was the actual result of the final solution?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! 2. What was Reconstruction? Why was it such a long process? (3-5 sentences, 10pts) (To answer this question, thi
    5·1 answer
  • How did WWI affect women’s fight for rights in the early 1900s? (I kinda know the answer to this, just need to see someone else'
    5·2 answers
  • By the early 1700s, religious influence in the American colonies
    5·1 answer
  • Who is the head of government in a city-parish government system?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!