Answer:
a. not change; improve
Explanation:
Balance of trade is the difference in value over a period of time between a country’s imports and exports of goods and services, usually expressed in the unit of currency of a particular country (e.g., dollars for the United States, yen for the Japan).
Balance of payments record the receipts and payments of the residents of the country in their transactions with residents of other countries.
A Japanese insurance company purchases U.S. government securities. From the perspective of the United States, the balance of trade with Japan will not change and the balance of payments with Japan will improve.
The amount of compensation expense Crane should record for 2017 under the fair value method is $207000
<u>Solution:</u>
From the given,
Stock options for 63000 shares
$10 par value common stock
$25 per share and the option price was $20
Total compensation expense = $627000
On calculating we get,
We can conclude that there is $207,000 decrease. Therefore, the correct answer is option c.
Answer:
systematic risk ,diversifiable risk
Explanation:
risk premium is the investment return demanded by an investor for buying a risky assets that an investment is anticipated to deliver it reward to those who are willing to take higher risk than investors who prefer risk free investment.
systematic risk when economic treds influence assets and the market in similr way than investment risk for similr assets are corellated Systematic risk cannot be diversified away. Non-systematic risk, or the risk unique to each individual security, meanwhile, can be mitigated through diversification.
conclusion: both the sytematic and nom systematic risk are the influencing factor of the risk premium while sytematic risk is not influenced by market but diversfiable risk are influenced by market .
brainly.com/question/14055202?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question
#spj4
<span>c. money is deducted from the balance on the debit card.</span>
Answer:
Imagine you have just flicked a lighter. If you don’t see the flame, you will naturally try a second time. If after the second attempt it does not strike a flame, you will repeat your action again and again until it does. Eventually, you’ll see the flame and you’ll know that your lighter works. But what if it doesn’t? How long are you going to flick the lighter until you decide to give up?
Our everyday life is full of such decision dilemmas and uncertainty. We constantly have to choose between options, whether we make the most ordinary decisions – should I continue flicking this lighter? – or life-changing choices – should I leave this relationship? We can either keep on doing what we are already used to do, or risk unexplored options that could turn out much more valuable.
Some people are naturally inclined to take more chances, while others prefer to hold on to what they know best. Yet being curious and explorative is fundamental for humans and animals to find out how best to harvest resources such as water, food or money. While looking at the Belém Tower – a symbol of Portugal’s great maritime discoveries – from my office window, I often wonder what drives people to explore the unknown and what goes on in their brains when weighing pros and cons for trying something new. To answer these questions, together with Dr. Zachary Mainen and his team of neuroscientists, we investigate how the brain deals with uncertainty when making decisions.
Explanation:
It is well known that the decision-making process results from communication between the prefrontal cortex (working memory) and hippocampus (long-term memory). However, there are other regions of the brain that play essential roles in making decisions, but their exact mechanisms of action still are unknown.
