The answer is B.
If you put one plant in wet soil, and one plant in dry soil, you can prove or disprove your hypothesis as the plants grow.
200 J of energy is wasted by the hair dryer.
Steps
- The hairdryer is provided with 1500 J of electrical energy per second
- Of this 1500 J, 1300 J of energy is actually used and converted to useful thermal energy per second
- The remaining energy, 1500 - 1300 = 200 J is dissipated
Dissipated energy
- The energy that is not efficiently transported or changed is wasted energy.
- We cannot create or destroy energy.
- An employable type of energy is created through transformation.
- Only a portion of energy that is changed or transferred can be done so in a way that is helpful.
Thus, 200 J of energy is wasted by the hair dryer.
Learn more about energy here:
brainly.com/question/166559
#SPJ10
using subtraction to determine the volume dispensed
making sure that you read the volume with the liquid inside the pipette at eye level
ensuring that air bubbles are not in the column of liquid inside the pipette
Answer:
The correct option is C. Building a well between the two wells that goes deeper into the earth would not stop the water from being polluted .
Explanation:
Even if a well was constructed between the wells B and C, it wouldn't have stopped the contamination of the water. As the oil would still be leaking and it would contaminate the wells.
All of the other options can be used to stop the contamination.
Option A suggests building an impermeable membrane that would stop the oil flow. Hence, the water in the wells will not be contaminated.
Option B suggests not using the water from the wells and using an alternate water supply. The alternate water supply wouldn't be contaminated with oil.
Option D suggests chemically purifying the contaminated water. This can be an effective technique to clean the contaminated water.
