Answer:
True
Explanation:
Value is the perception of the benefits or utility associated to consuming a good or a service in relation to the price of that good or service. This basically refers to consumer surplus, how much are consumers willing to pay for a good or service vs the actual cost of the good or service. If you increase the perceived benefits, then our consumers will value our goods or services more and this would increase their consumer surplus.
Consumers are the ones that ultimately will decide the value of our goods or services, and if they assign us a higher perceived value, they will be willing to pay a higher price for them.
Answer:
Change in Investment (Government Spending) = $200
Explanation:
Multiplier = k =∆Y/∆I = 1/(1-MPC)
Needed ∆Y = $1000 ; MPC = 0.8
1000/ ∆I = 1 / (1-0.8)
1000/∆I = 1 / 0.2
1000/∆I = 5
∆I = 1000/5
∆I = 200
<span>Marginal Cost of Capital may involve less calculation than WACC, however marginal cost may be calculated by incorporating tax rates, overhead, insurance or any other cost associated with acquiring the particular capital.</span>
Answer:
The algebraic formulation of the constraint is 4X+2Y ≤ 100
Explanation:
The algebraic formulation of the constraint is shown below:
Given that
The number of hours taken per unit of x is 4 hours
And the number of hours taken per unit of x is 2 hours
And, the maximum hours available is 100
Now based on the above information
The algebraic formulation of the constraint is
= 4X+2Y ≤ 100
hence, the same is to be considered
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
