Answer:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. The options are:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
b)Solicitation with promise of reward.
c) Appropriate.
d) Generalized
e) Positional authority.
In psychology, coercion is the act of forcing another person to act in a way that the person doesn't want to by using force or threats. This threats can include punishment if the person doesn't act the way the other person is asking to.
In this example Mathew promises to fire her if she doesn't engage in sexual activity with him. T<u>his "promise" is more like a threat and the consequence of not complying with it would be the punishment of getting fired</u>. Therefore, the right answer would be that this type of sexual harassment is a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Answer:
<em>Middle class
</em>
Explanation:
James Bradshaw came up with the term middle class in a pamphlet of 1745. <em>The notion of the class is connected to wealth and income, but it includes education as well as the type of work you do.</em>
The middle class comprises between 25% and 66% of households in the United States.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
