Specific Description. It's neither biased nor inappropriate, since both are factually true and informing about Stephanie. And it's not a cliched statement either.
Explanation:
Chewing gum is banned in Singapore under the Regulation of Imports and Exports (Chewing Gum) Regulations. ... One of the objectives of the ban was to prevent vandals from using spent chewing gums to disrupt Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) services.Jan 3, 1992
Answer: Judicial foreclosure
Explanation: Judicial foreclosure can also be called foreclosure by judicial sale. Judicial foreclosure involves the supervision of a court in the process of selling a mortgaged property.
In this scenario, the lender embark on a judicial foreclosure by filing a lawsuit to a court against the borrower to pay a mortgage debt for certain period of time or the lender take over the property.
Then, all parties involved are notified by the court for the foreclosure, albeit requirements for notification varies from state to state.
The correct answer is; criterion validity.
Further Explanation:
Karen developed the test so that she can measure the hostility in her workplace. She used previous employees who had been terminated on the basis of anger management issues. This has a high degree of criterion validity.
Her test is based on the prediction of an outcome and not on just factual information. This does work in some cases but only when the behavior closely matches the behavior of a previous case used in developing the test. If the cases are not very similar the test may not be conclusive.
Learn more about workplace hostility at brainly.com/question/6659394
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
B. Queried
Explanation:
In anthropologist field, Queried is an act of giving doubts toward the validity of a certain claim. Keep in mind that Queried does not mean completely reject the claim. But it merely suggest that might be a good idea to gain further evidence to proof that claim.
This can be seen when they are examining whether Neanderthal is a direct ancestor to humans. They based that assumption due to our similar mitochondrial. Even though it might be possible, we need to gained further proof to strengthen that claim. (since chimpanzees with identical mitochondrial are not closely related to us)
