I presume that it may be cucmbers sir
Explanation:
The Spanish and Mexican governments made many concessions and land grants in Alta California (now known as California) and Baja California from 1785 to 1846. The Spanish Concessions of land were made to retired soldiers as an inducement for them to remain in the frontier. These Concessions reverted to the Spanish crown upon the death of the recipient. The Mexican government later encouraged settlement by issuing much larger land grants to both native-born and naturalized Mexican citizens. The grants were usually two or more square leagues, or 35 square kilometres (14 sq mi) in size. Unlike Spanish Concessions, Mexican land grants provided permanent, unencumbered ownership rights. Most ranchos granted by Mexico were located along the California coast around San Francisco Bay, inland along the Sacramento River, and within the San Joaquin Valley.
When the government secularized the Mission churches in 1833, they required that land be set aside for each Neophyte family. But the Native Americans were quickly brushed aside by Californios who, with the help of those in power, acquired the church lands as grants. The indigenous peoples of the Americas ("Indians") instead became virtual slaves of the rancheros.
Spain made about 30 concessions between 1784 and 1821, and Mexico issued about 270 land grants between 1833 and 1846. The ranchos established permanent land-use patterns. The rancho boundaries became the basis for California's land survey system, and are found on modern maps and land titles. The "rancheros" (rancho owners) patterned themselves after the landed gentry of New Spain, and were primarily devoted to raising cattle and sheep. Their workers included Native Americans who had learned Spanish while living at one of the former Missions. The ranchos were often based on access to the resources necessary for raising cattle, such as grazing lands and water. Land development from that time forward has often followed the boundaries of the ranchos, and many of their names are still in use. For example, Rancho San Diego is now an unincorporated "rural-burb" east of San Diego, and Rancho Bernardo is a suburb in San Diego.
1. Roman women could hold office- False
2. Roman women could own property- True
3. Roman women could divorce their husbands- True
Explanation:
Roman women has less political and social status than their men. Roman women can not hold office. They can not occupy a higher position in office. Though who belong to elite society they some time hold a position in social hierarchy.
Roman women can bought property and could be its owner also. Roman women have the power to authorize her property in single handle. Roman women have the right to divorce her husband. If a couple is not happy in their marriage then the female partner can take the decision to be separated from her husband.
An aircraft is usually granted the right-of-way when they are in distress
<h3>What is Right-of-Way?</h3>
This refers to the legal right that a vehicle or aircraft has to pass a route that is a territory of another. This is usually done when there is distress on the part of an aircraft.
Furthermore, some air crafts that have right-of-way over others are:
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview to help you get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about right-of-way here:
brainly.com/question/13393277
#SPJ11
The correct answer is social loafing.
Social loafing refers to the phenomenon where a person puts in less effort to achieve a goal, when he/she is part of a group, compared to when he/she is working alone. Social loafing usually occurs due to diffusion of responsibility, where a person feels less responsible and motivated to help out, when he/she is in a group with other people. In this instance, Carlene demonstrates that she dislikes social loafing because she believes that when working in a group, there is always going to be someone who is content to sit back and let others do the work.
