Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Answer:
sex-discrimination
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Martha succeeded in eliminating sex-discrimination by opening up her institution to all genders. The other institution was discriminating women by not letting them learn to sail, so by doing what Martha did she not only eliminated sex-discrimination but will most likely obtain a large clientele that has no other options than going to Martha's institution.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Africa is known for their precious diamond mining so diamond is one. Oil is also another big thing
Answer:
1) World War 2 wars
2) Civil Rights Movements
Explanation:
1) Attack on Pearl Harbor, being specific, anyway, they caught the US off gaurd and forced their entry into the war.
2) They forced the war to change its ways and the way they saw black people.
(So sorry for very weak answer but had to do this in like 2 minutes. Sorry!)
