<span> World War I changed the face of warfare. It was caught between the old tactics of set-piece battles and gentlemanly tactics and the idea of Total War that was beginning to be used.
Neither side really knew how the new technologies would change the way that war worked, or how high the carnage would be. Defensive weaponry had advanced far beyond that of offensive, so both sides could dig in and hold off large attacks, but neither could really advance very much.
Finally, the mindset of the people had to change. Up until that point, war had been thought by many to be nothing more than a grand game (British troops in the first months marched across the battlefield kicking soccer balls, thinking that it would be fun to win the war, they were slaughtered en masse). That idea was detrimental to running a real war. </span>
B. <span>Class action suit would be the most appropriate
</span>
I would use a punnet square to explain this. the probability is 50% for a boy and 50% for a girl.
Answer: Hello! You did not show us the choices.
Explanation:
The problem in the sentence "James is more smarter than Steven", is option A. Double Comparison. Double comparison happens when we use the word more or less plus the comparative form of an adjective with the suffix -er.
