1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna1 [17]
3 years ago
14

Considering that Holmes and Balwani are the only ones charged by the SEC and the only ones facing criminal charges, what, if any

, moral responsibility should be placed on the board of directors, investors, and employees? In other words, should those that enabled Holmes to continue to lie also be held accountable for their actions? Why or why not? Be sure to include moral argumentation to support your position.
Business
1 answer:
DedPeter [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The investors, board of directors and employees for Theranos are not likely to have been completely free of fault in the more than a decade long fraud. The press has called the firm 'secretive' as it struggled to find any pertinent information about the it due to their closely guarded secrets. The firm operated a website that didn't have much on it and seemed to gag its directors, investors and others from talking to the press. These alone should have been a red flag to the investors and board. The PR person also refused interviews, neglected to answer questions about the owners/founders and turned down multiple overtures by the press to try and find out what was going on behind closed doors at Theranos. This encouraged the general perception that the firm was trying to control and minimise risk and possibly to retain an air of mystery. All of which was actually designed to hide the true workings of the firm, and this should have been questioned by all the people involved in the firm.

(Leuty, 2013)

The board as illustrious as theirs would have asked for supporting documentation and reviews for all the key aspects of the company and these would have needed to be audited periodically to ensure that the board can choose the best people in key roles and to enable good decision-making.

Investors also would have done a background check on all material aspects such as legal, ethical etc. before handing over large sums of money.

Employees involved in the actual fraud - falsifying results, using other tools to get the results that their tools were supposed to generate etc. were also aware of the issues with the firm likely from the very beginning.

All three groups possibly knew some or all of the aspects of the fraud and yet they did not come forward to disclose the same to the authorities or their customers as they should have. This points to a serious moral lapse amongst all three groups. They each as a group and as individuals in that group needed to take moral responsibility for the fraudulent activities being perpetrated by the couple. As the law goes, the prime players only end up being held accountable however it would have been ethically right for all parties that knew of the fraud to come forward and expose it.

Leaving aside the monetary considerations such as fleecing investors and customers alike, the products were related to the medical field, which above all others has a responsibility to maintain a higher standard of ethics. This fraud caused countless incorrect results that would have been used in medical therapies and diagnoses leading to wrong medication allocations and patient treatments. This in turn would have led to pain and anguish of the physical kind for so many patients, all of whom are the silent sufferers in this fraud.

Legally, pain and suffering cannot be quantified (just estimated) while this is the primary damage that the couple should have actually been charged with. This extremity of damage cannot be adequately presented in a court of law however and that brings us to discussing the morality of the situation. For all of the reasons stated above, the couple and everyone involved in enabling them in the fraud - the board of directors, employees and investors, should definitely be held accountable, if not in a court of law, then at least in the court of public opinion so that fraudsters like them do not get away without paying a price for their actions. All actions have consequences and their actions or lack there of should be accounted for.

References :

Leuty, Ron (2013) Secretive Theranos emerging (partly) from shadows. San Francisco Business Times.

You might be interested in
Supplies that are not used immediately are recorded as a(n) ______ when purchased.
Shkiper50 [21]

Supplies that are not used immediately are recorded as an asset when purchased. Supplies are various items belonging to the company that have consumable properties, or can be used many times. In general, various items that are included in the equipment or supplies have a shape that tends to be smaller and has the aim of completing the company's needs.

Supplies are divided into two things, which is:

1. Office supplies or office supplies are various items that are needed to carry out various office activities, such as paper, pens, pencils, erasers, rulers, pencil sharpeners and various other stationery.

2. Factory equipment or factory supplies are various items needed to carry out activities in the factory. A simple example is a variety of equipment to be able to maintain and clean production machinery equipment.

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
An opportunity cost: Multiple Choice Is an unavoidable cost because it remains the same regardless of the alternativ
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

Is the potential benefit lost by choosing a specific alternativecourse of action among two or more.

Explanation:

This question is incomplete. The complete question can be found here: https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/opportunity-cost--unavoidable-cost-remains-regardless-alternative-chosen-b-requires-curren-q10956439

Here is the complete question:

An opportunity cost:

Is an unavoidable cost because it remains the same regardless ofthe alternative chosen.

Requires a current outlay of cash.

Results from past managerial decisions.

Is the potential benefit lost by choosing a specific alternativecourse of action among two or more.

Is irrelevant in decision making because it occurred in the past.

Opportunity cost is the cost of the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.

An example of opportunity cost :

Martha has three options : Start her company, remain employed or go on vacation. If she leaves her job to start her company she would earn $5,000,000 per year. She earns $1 million where she works. She values vacation at $2 million.

If she decides to stay employed, her opportunity cost is $5 million. The amount she would have made if she started her company.

If she decides to start her company, her opportunity cost is $2 million. The amount she values vacation

Opportunity cost doesn't remain the same regardless of the option taken.

If martha wants to maximise profit , she would start her business because if yields the highest payoffs. Opportunity cost is relevant to making decisions.

I hope my answer helps you

8 0
3 years ago
What is nursing ?why is it needed?​
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer: What type of nursing?

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Lean/JIT systems the burden of ensuring quality of production inputs from vendors shifts from the _____________ to the ______
irina [24]

Answer:

Buyer/seller

Explanation:

In the case of lean system it focused on the customer side while on the other hand the JIT i.e. Just in time focused on the manufacturing process i.e. efficiency

So in the case of lean or JIT system the burden for ensuring the production quality from vendor shifts is from the buyer to the seller

Therefore the above represents the answer

6 0
3 years ago
Suppose that real GDP is currently $ 13.8 trillion and potential real GDP is $ 14.0 trillion, or a gap of $ 200 billion. The gov
MAXImum [283]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.

Step-by-step explanation:

You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.  

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mike’s intent to rob the bank satisfies which of the requirements for conviction?​
    6·1 answer
  • f a society decides to produce consumer goods from its available resources, it is answering the basic economic question,
    10·1 answer
  • In the short run,
    15·1 answer
  • Pauline received a postcard from a local antique mall. The card invited her to attend an invitation-only open house at the mall
    5·1 answer
  • A food service operation that is concerned with sourcing asks suppliers detailed questions about _____ the food is produced. A.
    7·2 answers
  • Country A and Country B have had an informal trading arrangement for many years wherein merchants on the border of the countries
    10·1 answer
  • The following trial balance was extracted from the books of Kalekeno, a sole trader, at 31st Dec2018:
    14·1 answer
  • What’s the answer???
    9·1 answer
  • Why does Publix expect you to bag with two hands
    6·1 answer
  • A factory machine was purchased for $380000 on January 1, 2021. It was estimated that it would have a $70000 salvage value at th
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!