Answer:
The answer would be TRUE
Explanation:
It was once commonly thought that infants lack the ability to form complex ideas. For much of this century, most psychologists accepted the traditional thesis that a newborn’s mind is a blank slate (tabula rasa) on which the record of experience is gradually impressed. It was further thought that language is an obvious prerequisite for abstract thought and that, in its absence, a baby could not have knowledge. Since babies are born with a limited repertoire of behaviors and spend most of their early months asleep, they certainly appear passive and unknowing. Until recently, there was no obvious way for them to demonstrate otherwise.
But challenges to this view arose. It became clear that with carefully designed methods, one could find ways to pose rather complex questions about what infants and young children know and can do. Armed with new methodologies, psychologists began to accumulate a substantial body of data about the remarkable abilities that young children possess that stands in stark contrast to the older emphases on what they lacked. It is now known that very young children are competent, active agents of their own conceptual development. In short, the mind of the young child has come to life
.
Answer:
designing and maintaining the bridge structure
Explanation:
Explanation:
?
i don't understand what u saying
Answer: No characters don't have to be likable. There could be a connection because it could be what you see in yourself. Reflection almost.
Explanation:
The reader can often relate to the unlikable character because the character resembles a part of the reader. Hope this helps!
Answer:
<h3>Charles Wright Mills was an American sociologist, and a professor of sociology at Columbia University from 1946 until his death in 1962. Mills was published widely in popular and intellectual journals.</h3>
Explanation:
<h3>HLO ,,,,U ASKED ME THAT IS THAT UR REAL PIC ,,,,yes it's my real pic.</h3><h3>i am sarthak can call sarthu </h3>
