Answer:
Answer for the question:
Marion Company has 30,000 shares of common stock outstanding during all of 2016. This common stock has been selling at an average market price of $45 per share. Marion also has outstanding for the entire year compensatory share options to purchase 4,000 shares of common stock at $32 per share. The unrecognized compensation cost (net of tax) relating to these share options is $3 per share. During 2016, Marion earned income of $36,000 after income taxes of 30%.
1. Compute Marion's 2016 diluted earnings per share. If required, round your answer to two decimal places.
2. Assume Marion uses IFRS. Compute its earnings per share assuming IFRS is used. If required, round your answer to two decimal places.
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Planning is one of my strengths, but it does depend on ones ability to get things together, and be fast and com up with things in the spot , it is a powerful and important duty to uphold , but definitely one of my strengths
One of my weaknesses is organizing , keeping things in there order is not a specialty of mine although I do like it when things are where they are supposed to be, but me personally I don’t find organizing to be one of the most important things
Can you please explain more? :)
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
