1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tanya [424]
3 years ago
6

Which colonial city did a british member of parliament refer to as a "nest of locusts"?

History
2 answers:
Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Philadelphia is the right answer. I think. not sure though</span>
Goryan [66]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is: Boston.

Lord North, prime minister from 1770 to 1782, is the author of this phrase, refering to the americans bad behavior. He said -<em> ...you will never meet with proper obedience to the laws of this country until you habe destroyed that nest of locusts.-</em> This was his reaction to the Boston Tea Party. On march 1774 he passed the Coercive acts and closed the port of Boston to all traffic.

You might be interested in
Sorry for those who saw the other one without the boxes. I don't know what happened they just didn't show up. But if you could h
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

Economic Impact: labor systems, money, levels of Technology

Political Impact: war, loyalty to leader, state control of trade

Social/ Culture Impact: social class, family order, gender relations, and religious influences

hoped it helped!!!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Charter colonies were operated as a business where land grants were given to business owners who
Kruka [31]
Your answer is true
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?
seraphim [82]

<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>

<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>

<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>

<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Freedom of speech in the First Amendment can also be described by which example?
ella [17]

Answer:

you are allowed to protest in front of the statehouse even if the governor disagree with your opinion

Explanation:

you are allowed to protest because it is your right as a citizen but your freedom is restricted because your can't use your right to curse someone but you can exercise your right as a citizen who pays taxes because you pay taxes of one percent in whatever you pay ( freedom to speech but under restrictions )

4 0
2 years ago
Who or what are the maquiladoras? death squads that hunt and kill the beggar children of brazil elite members of mexico's newly
STALIN [3.7K]
Maquiladoras are "assembly-for-export factories along the Mexican border." In Spanish, "máquina" means "machine," so we can think that "maquiladora" (which sounds similar) has to do with making machines, or that the maquiladora itself is run like a machine, since the employees often work in assembly lines. Another word for "maquiladora" is "maquila," which further bolsters this word association to "máquina." 
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is jefferson davis legacy?
    12·1 answer
  • Why were many americans of the 1920s and 1930s bitter toward american's world war I allies
    13·1 answer
  • What was the overall importance of mcculloch v. maryland (1819)? a. the justices announced that dual federalism did not conform
    8·1 answer
  • What did charters give the virginia company the right to do what
    13·1 answer
  • Which languages are parts of indo-european language family?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement would most likely be made by a supporter of sanctions as a tool of foreign policy?
    9·2 answers
  • Halp plzzz<br><br> will mark brainlest!
    10·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the document?
    10·2 answers
  • Who immigrated to Chicago during the late 1800s and early 1900s?
    5·1 answer
  • Match each US Cold War strategy to the event in which it was used.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!