1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DanielleElmas [232]
3 years ago
14

How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected?

History
2 answers:
solniwko [45]3 years ago
8 0
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "A. By saying that school disturbances due to freedom of expression are a big problem, but not in this case." Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected b<span>y saying that school disturbances due to freedom of expression are a big problem, but not in this case</span>
PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>(A) By saying that school disturbances due to freedom of expression are a big problem, but not in this case. </u></em>

Further Explanations:

Abraham Fortas an American Jurist and Lawyer, served as an "Associate Justice of Supreme Court" from 1965 to 1969. Being a native of Memphis, Tennessee, he chose the profession of "Law Professor" at Yale University and also served as the advisor of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

During 1968, Fortas appeal the court to accept the Case of "Little Rock Central High School" teacher who was challenging the Arkansas' anti-evolution Law along with the Support of states teacher Union spite of ruling in favor of Epperson, Supreme Court overruled the decision. It was after the initial hearing Court reserved the decision again and defended it as free speech constitutional right.

He was praised for his work and his portrait was placed in Yale Law School by an unwritten by a Unanimous donor.

Learn More

1. what did china agree to do once the treaty of Nanjing was signed? check all that apply?<u>brainly.com/question/175568 </u>

2. under the articles of confederation, if Virginia had ten thousand citizens and Delaware had five thousand citizens, how many votes would each state have in the legislature?<u>brainly.com/question/9935193 </u>

3. in the supreme court’s decision in Korematsu v. united states, the court said that Korematsu?<u>brainly.com/question/8391589 </u>

Answer Details

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Topic:Abraham Fortas

Keywords:Abraham Fortas, jurist, Lawyer, Associate Justice, Supreme Court, Memphis, Tennessee, Law Professor, Yale University, Arkansas, anti-evolution Law, Epperson, Supreme Court

You might be interested in
During the
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

Hellenistic

Explanation:

During the Hellenistic era, numerous civilizations in the Middle East adopted Greek language, ideas, and culture.

Hellenistic period was known as the period between the death of Alexander the Great and the formation of the Roman Empire. The Greeks experienced a high period of dominance and success in spheres of life such as architecture, literature, religion during this period which made other countries to adopt its style.

8 0
3 years ago
What part did religion play in Tsarist autocracy?
NARA [144]

Ivan the Terrible was Russian Orthodox; he had St. Basil's Cathedral built.

3 0
3 years ago
Which countries were involved in World War II? Select all that apply. Great Britain Germany Italy France United States Japan
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer: Axis Powers ( Germany, Japan, Italy)

Allie (France, Great Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and, to a lesser extent, China)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What are at least 2 examples of how individual Rights impact our social, political, and economic systems? Provide 2 examples for
Damm [24]

Answer:

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did fighting continue in iraq after president bush declared the major combat was over
docker41 [41]

Answer:

President Bush announced the end of major combat operations, not that the war was over.

Explanation:

Neither President officially said the war was over. And the administration in a bit of cockiness did make a variety of statements about how the war was over (the "mission accomplished" banner, a speech by Rumsfeld, etc.).  The Bush administration did not anticipate or plan for any kind of real insurgency and at the time of the invasion, there was no al-Qaeda presence in Iraq so the continued fighting came as a major surprise.

President Obama announced the end of US combat involvement in Iraq.  Technically that was true--the SOFA (US status of forces agreement) had expired and the only elements we were allowed to have in Iraq at that point were trainers, security (for US personnel and our embassy) and support (for instance, the Iraqi air force was almost non-existent).  But no authorized combat units.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which direction did dewey sail from hong kong to the philippines?
    13·1 answer
  • Which people were part of a clergy in middle times?
    12·1 answer
  • Where did some seminole remain after bottingthe american government
    9·1 answer
  • What was the main diet of pre-agricultural Asians?
    8·2 answers
  • What choice describe some of the difficulties John Adams faced as president
    12·1 answer
  • What led to genocide in Cambodia
    15·2 answers
  • The viewpoint toward Muslim slaves in this account is best described by which of these statements?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the main idea of this excerpt?
    11·1 answer
  • How do you feel about the "emo quartet"? Personally, I don't like them because they aren't even emo. Sure, P!ATD and FOB's older
    15·2 answers
  • 3 Over two years, how much more will a savings account with a simple interest rate of 4.2% yield in earnings than a savings acco
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!