All categories

3 years ago

How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected?

2 answers:

8 0

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "A. By saying that school disturbances due to freedom of expression are a big problem, but not in this case." Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected by saying that school disturbances due to freedom of expression are a big problem, but not in this case

PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago

8 0

(A) By saying that school disturbances due to freedom of expression are a big problem, but not in this case.

Further Explanations:

Abraham Fortas an American Jurist and Lawyer, served as an "Associate Justice of Supreme Court" from 1965 to 1969. Being a native of Memphis, Tennessee, he chose the profession of "Law Professor" at Yale University and also served as the advisor of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

During 1968, Fortas appeal the court to accept the Case of "Little Rock Central High School" teacher who was challenging the Arkansas' anti-evolution Law along with the Support of states teacher Union spite of ruling in favor of Epperson, Supreme Court overruled the decision. It was after the initial hearing Court reserved the decision again and defended it as free speech constitutional right.

He was praised for his work and his portrait was placed in Yale Law School by an unwritten by a Unanimous donor.

Learn More

1. what did china agree to do once the treaty of Nanjing was signed? check all that apply?brainly.com/question/175568

2. under the articles of confederation, if Virginia had ten thousand citizens and Delaware had five thousand citizens, how many votes would each state have in the legislature?brainly.com/question/9935193

3. in the supreme court’s decision in Korematsu v. united states, the court said that Korematsu?brainly.com/question/8391589

Answer Details

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Topic:Abraham Fortas

Keywords:Abraham Fortas, jurist, Lawyer, Associate Justice, Supreme Court, Memphis, Tennessee, Law Professor, Yale University, Arkansas, anti-evolution Law, Epperson, Supreme Court

You might be interested in

Question 3 of 10

Over [174]

Answer:

English woman's property when she married came under the control of her husband.

Explanation:

According to married women property act, the property which was owned by women in the form of gift, investment or inheritance is naturally transferred to her husband. The law considers both legal and husband and wife to be a single entity and the husband absorbs her property.

After marriage, an English wife had all authority to own the property but she cannot control or manage it. For example, if she holds a land, she can possess the legal ownership but she cannot rent it or mortgage it or sell it.

This act was later altered and affirmed that the wages earned by women should be treated as a separate property.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is not an example of a check or balance put into the U.S. Constitution?

katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

Congress reviews a judicial decision and overturns the Supreme Court

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Florida today is a "swing" state, meaning that

kap26 [50]

Basically it's a key to candidates because it is considered to influence the overall result of the president election. Democratic and Republicans both have a good chance to gain a win.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What colony does maine belong to?

AlekseyPX

Massachusetts bay colony

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the US. treat immigrants during WWII?

Akimi4 [234]

Japanese internment camps were established during World War II by President Franklin Roosevelt through his Executive Order 9066. ... Enacted in reaction to Pearl Harbor and the ensuing war, the Japanese internment camps are now considered one of the most atrocious violations of American civil rights in the 20th century.

4 0

3 years ago