Answer:
- not linear
- somewhere between 184 and 186 (maybe)
Step-by-step explanation:
As you show, the weight differences are different for the same week differences, so the table is not linear. A graph (attached) can also show you the table is not linear.
__
The highest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 7 lbs in 3 weeks, or 4 2/3 pounds in 2 weeks. The lowest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 5 lbs in 3 weeks, or 3 1/3 pounds in 2 weeks. Based on the rates shown in the table, we might expect the starting weight to be between 3 1/3 and 4 2/3 pounds more than the first table value:
Week 0 weight: between 184 1/3 and 185 2/3 lbs, estimated.
_____
A "line of best fit" for the data has a y-intercept of about 185 pounds, which is the midpoint between our two estimates above.
Answer:
616
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
3. Option 2 (Perpendicular)
4. Option 3 (neither)
Step-by-step explanation:
3.
m1 = -7/8
Second equation: -8x + 7y = -21
7y = 8x - 21 y = (8/7)x - 3
m2 = 8/7
m1 & m2 are not equal, so not parallel
Since m1×m2 = (-7/8)(8/7) = -1,
They are Perpendicular
4.
m1 = -1/4
Second equation: -2x + 8y = 6
8y = 2x + 6 y = (1/4)x + 3/4
m2 = 1/4
m1 & m2 are not equal, so not parallel
Since m1×m2 = (-1/4)(1/4) = -1/16, not -1. They are not Perpendicular either. So, neither
Answer:
<1 <2 and <1 <4
Step-by-step explanation:
A supplementary angle is a straight line with 180 degrees.
The answer is c because it’s not a or d and maybe not b so ye c