This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Alanis is sitting down after school to examine the research project she has been assigned in her high-school history class. She must first research the reasons behind the Great Depression in American history. Then, she must develop assertions concerning the best way to nurture a nation's economy. Which type of thinking has her teacher asked her to engage in?
A. Inductive reasoning
B. Deductive reasoning
C. Utilizing representativeness heuristics
D. Utilizing availability heuristics
Answer:
The type of thinking she was asked to engage in is:
A. Inductive reasoning
.
Explanation:
<u>When we engage in inductive reasoning, we use premises to reach a conclusion. In other words, we use data that we know to be true or false to draw possible conclusions from.</u> In inductive reasoning, there is room for error. That is, even if all the premises are true, the conclusion we reach can very well be false. In the case explained in the passage, Alanis has been asked to research the reasons behind the Great Depression. The reasons will be her premises. From them, she must draw a conclusion - how to nurture a nation's economy. However, even with the right and true premises, Alanis can still come up with ideas that wouldn't really work to nurture the economy. That is an example of inductive reasoning.
Answer:
A limited government is basically called a liberalist government.
Explanation:
A government whose power is limited.
The word that fits the blank would be INTERACTIONIST. In the modern times, human development has been taken through an interactionist approach by most psychologists. This kind of approach involves social interaction and how this has shaped and changed the society.
<u>Answer:
</u>
To cope up with the recession in 2001, the tax cuts in 2003 were enacted by the then President Robert Bush.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The income tax cut named as the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act was enacted by Bush on May 28th 2003.
- The primary intention was to end the recession occurred in 2001. This Act reduced the Capital gains tax rate from 20 to 15 percent.
- It ensured the taxpayers who were paying 10-15 percent slowly reduced to 0 tax in 2008. Small businesses were eased with tax deductions.
- This has worked effectively for the personal income tax payers and middle class.
- The gross domestic product showed betterment within a year after the implementation of this act.
