Answer:
-1
Step-by-step explanation:
-2/3 - 1/3
Since the denominators are the same, we can combine the numerators
-3/3
Simplify
-1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Since n < 30, we will find the t-score and compare that to the t-score of a significance level of 1%.
Since they are asking if the difference is significant, we will have a two tailed test, with degree of freedom being 22, so our critical values are
t < -2.704 and t > 2.704
Our t-value for this situation is
t = ([µ + 5.8] - µ)/(1.4/√23)
It's µ + 5.8 because the problem told us that their levels are 5.8 mm higher than the average, so it's the average, plus 5.8
Simplify the equation...
t = 5.8/(1.4/√23)
t = 19.868
19.868 > 2.704, the evidence supports that there is significant difference between the sample and the population
Answer:
A and C
<em>I hope this helps! ^^</em>
<em></em>
Step 1 he had to multiply the $22.75 times 3 weeks it should have been
($22.75 x 3) + $32.75 - $14.25
$68.25 + 32.75 - $14.25
$86.75
Not sure what algebra tiles are
not sure how to absolutely prove
I can prove it works at least most of the time by subsitute ing number for x
remember that 0,1,2 have special properties and are not very good for subsituting so
try 4
4+8(4)=4(2(4)+1)
true or false?
4+8(4)=4(2(4)+1)
multipily
4+32=4(8+1)
36=4(9)
36=36
this is treu at least for the number 4
another way is to believe in the distributive property where
a(b+c)=ab+ac so then
4(2x+1)=4(2x)+4(1)=8x+4=4+8x
