Answer:
The expected return on her portfolio is B) 11.8%
Explanation:
Hi, the expected return of a portfolio can be found by multiplying the weight of each of the assets times each of its expected return, that is:
So everything should look like this
The expected return of the portfolio is 11.8%, that is option B)
Best of luck.
Answer:
The beginning balance in accounts receivable was: $47,500
Explanation:
Sales reported on the income statement were $385,500, Accounts receivable increased of $385,500 during the period.
Sales, adjusted to a cash basis using the direct method on the statement of cash flows, were $359,000. The company collected $359,000 from the sales. Accounts receivable decreased of $359,000 during the period.
The beginning balance in accounts receivable = The ending balance of accounts receivable + Accounts receivable decreased during the period - Accounts receivable increased during the period = $74,000 + $359,000 - $385,500 = $47,500
Answer:
The correct answer is: Showmanship.
Explanation:
Showmanship in marketing implies attracting the target population by doing the very same activity of the good or service offered. Showmanship is usually manipulated somehow to benefit the product being displayed over others so it will look more reliable for potential consumers.
Answer:
Comparative advertisements need legal support for their claims and must not misrepresent competing products/brands
Explanation:
Comparative advertisement is also called advertising war. A competitor is named in the advertisement and reasons are given why the competitor's product is inferior to the one being advertised.
In this type of advertisement to prevent adverse legal action the company needs to carry out extensive research to provide legal backing for their claims.
Firms must also not misrepresent the competitor's product as this can lead to legal action.
Answer:
5 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
10 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
Explanation:
Alphaland's opportunity cost of producing one ton of pepper = 80 ÷ 5
= 16 tons of salt
Betaton's opportunity cost of producing one ton of pepper = 3 ÷ 1
= 3 tons of salt
Alphaland's opportunity cost of producing one ton of salt = 5 ÷ 80
= 0.0625 tons of pepper
Betaton's opportunity cost of producing one ton of salt = 1 ÷ 3
= 0.3333 tons of pepper
Therefore, Betaton has a comparative advantage in producing pepper because it has the lower opportunity cost of producing pepper as compared to Alphaland. On the other hand, Alphaland has a comparative advantage in producing salt because it has the lower opportunity cost of producing salt as compared to Betaton.
Hence, Betaton is specialized in the production of pepper and Alphaland is specialized in the production of salt.
Trade is beneficial for both the nations when Alphaland buys pepper at a price lower than the 16 tons of salt and Betaton sells pepper at a price greater than 3 tons of salt.
Trade ratios:
5 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
10 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
