Answer:
B
Explanation:
It's also important because some people fought and died for the right to vote.
I would try to give him a brief background about the issue. Let him imagine a scenario where he is affected by the issue. I would give out facts (logos) about the current issue. Next, I would share my personal views (pathos) about the issue and finally, tell him of my reputation and stand (ethos).
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: A restraint that provides protection without having to be handled by the occupant is called a passive restraint.
Explanation:
Answer:
i cant help you with that
Explanation:
