The answer is B hope this helped!
<span><span>Large nameplate capacity per plant, typically around 1 GW.
</span><span>Typically 90% capacity factor, maximizing output from the nameplate capacity.
</span><span>Small fuel transportation volumes as the fissionable material just isn't that big or heavy compared to equivalent fossil fuel BTU sources.
</span><span>Low CO2 per MWH on a full life cycle basis. ~12 grams which is only slightly more than wind / solar.
This is a reason nuclear is a much better source for one of the major pressing problems of today than fossil fuels: global warming.</span>No particulate matter pollution.No sulfur dioxide or other chemical pollution.<span>Low fatalities per TWH.
Nuclear is higher than renewables according to current statistics, but much, much lower than fossil fuel generation.</span></span>
Nuclear power generates lots of clean, stable energy.
we are not "made of stardust" we just are 40% stardust(an impressive amount seeing as the stardust atom is heavier than normal atoms).
So base on the question, I would only say YES, because and experiment must be done in a safe place with a professionals and more importantly it would be safe to all including the people around the factory. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more
