Order of succession law

2 answers:

8 0

The current Presidential Succession Act was adopted in 1947, and last revised in 2006. The line of succession follows the order of: vice president, speaker of the House of Representatives, president pro tempore of the Senate, and then the eligible heads of federal executive departments who form the president's Cabinet.

Alla [95]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

An order of succession or right of succession is the sequence of those entitled to hold a high office such as head of state or an honor such as a title of nobility in the order in which they stand in line to it when it becomes vacated. This sequence may be regulated through descent or by statute.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

PLZ HURRY IM TIMED

Serhud [2]

Answer:

Trying to say that all men and wemon have equal rights

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Following a vote on a bill in the Arizona State Senate, which of the following scenarios will likely take place? ( I know B is i

pogonyaev

Answer:

The correct answer is A.

3 0

2 years ago

What was the main theme of FDR's address to the nation after he won the election?

Sonbull [250]

Answer:

He was ready to give the people the new leadership they wanted.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Imagine a 28-year-old man named Keith is about to be released from prison after serving a seven-year sentence. Keith is not sure

Murrr4er [49]

Once he is released, he will need help finding a job, place to stay, and maintaining money. Keith might get a job then feel stressed about other life problems and start using drugs which is where he needs help managing money.

8 0

3 years ago

1) What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof

Bess [88]

Answer:

People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.

No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago