1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
3 years ago
7

Can i drive to school and work with my learners permit? florida

Law
1 answer:
Yakvenalex [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

depending on how old you are you will need to go to the dmv and get a waiver

Explanation:

i just went through drivers ed my self, and i live in fl, and a few students also had this question, the dmv should be able to guide you better. but if you are younger tahn 18 i think youd need a waiver

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of a primary source?
Zinaida [17]

Answer: C for Constitution

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain Why do we need to overhaul and <br> simplify the law
zlopas [31]

Answer:  When the law is so vast that it cant be understood by the one supposedly breaking the law, the person can be found guilty of a crime based on the interpretation as others see the law which might conflict someone elses interpretation.

Explanation:  We all have a right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness but how can you restrict that by writing more laws that contradict this right?

7 0
3 years ago
Hello Brainly Friends! I don't have a question but, I wanted to tell you that... I want you to subscribe to 3 channels. The name
pogonyaev
Answer:

I will subscribe!

Explanation:
8 0
3 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Drag the tiles to the boxes to complete the pairs.
daser333 [38]

Answer:

what are options o did not understand this question

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Bif was in gails office waiting to go to lunch with her. Gail owned a business in competition with bifs business. When Gail excu
    10·1 answer
  • So if someone went from Alabama to Texas to pick up a family member and take them back to Alabama would it be legal
    14·2 answers
  • If chris is on trial and does not want to testify in court, what would happen to chris?
    10·1 answer
  • If you are under the age of 18 and accumulate six or more points,
    15·1 answer
  • When arriving at a gas station to pump gas, what is the consequence for unknowingly using someone elses card to fill your tank a
    13·1 answer
  • A government agency has been given authority to oversee business activity in
    11·1 answer
  • Identify a road safety regulation for a passenger in a car and why that measure is
    7·1 answer
  • O que influencia a moda adolescente
    14·1 answer
  • Blood stains are found layered on top of each other at a crime scene. This means that more than one person was injured and bleed
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement is true about oral contracts?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!