Carol Giligan was able to extend Kohlberg’s research by
having to be able to focus on her research on Girls and Boys in which she was
able to show and present that both were able to be judge what is right and what
is wrong based on the different standards.
Answer:
Voting is the form of political participation do members of the voting age population engage in less than the other.
Explanation:
Political Participation refers to list of activities through which people take part in making political decisions by expressing their opinions.
Voting Age population means when a person becomes eligible to vote when they reach the mentioned age limit, mostly it is 18 years of age to become eligible.
In democracy, voting is the most common way in which voting age population engage in. Citizens when become eligible for voting, they vote for a candidate from the list of candidates who stand for elections.
#2 I think if not than #3
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
