For severe crimes, like taking a life of a human being, yes. I think it would in that case.
But I don't think it should be a penalty to such a large punishment such as a death penalty, because what if the criminal did something minor, like stealing from a small candy store or something like that? Would you really give that kind of person a punishment such as death, which the victim cannot redo life and try to improve as a better person?
I think the death penalty should be used for people who are long gone in mind and cannot come back, if you would know what I mean (people who don't feel regret for something like murder and such). In my opinion, that is! :)
Thanks,
-xxred24
Answer:
The correct answer is Subsidizing research and development into new weaving technologies.
Explanation:
Human capital and investment in Research and Development are considered the two main drivers of productivity accross nations. The weaving industry is labor-intensive, but does not require highly qualified workforce, thus, an economic policy focused on education might not have a direct impact on productivity. Investing on R&D might be a better policy since it might lead to improving production techniques and increased productivity in the long term.
Answer:
I believe the answer is Maine but im not 100%
It is true that a promise by one party to pay another for
refraining from an act is enforceable. The deed is being true to one’s own word
and it is also considered as a business and personal law. If there’s a contract
involved, the more it is enforceable.
Answer: A neurochemical memory trace disintegrates over time
Forgetting from the short term memory is best explained by the trace decay theory. This theory believes that the memory leaves a trace in the nervous system. It can be a physical or chemical trace however, the trace fades away in just a matter of time.