Historians often focus greatly on the empires to the north of Egypt as being the ones with whom the pharaohs had the most interaction. After all, it was the Hittites who were nearly defeated by Ramses the Great and the Assyrians and the Persians who were able to conquer Egypt. However, a powerful kingdom, named Kush, to the south of Egypt, just beyond the first rapids of the Nile, was not only able to maintain extensive economic ties with the Egyptians, but was even able to conquer them for a period of time.
The 3 differences and similarities between the old and new city-states were:
Difference 1. The Old City States were developed around a proto-socialist economy which was mostly controlled by the government.
The new city States were more developed around personal enterprise where independent people could earn money.
Difference 2: Old city States had a social structure that consisted of a 'Farmer' class which worked in the plantations. In the new city States, this work was conducted by poor people who could earn a living or get food return. The work was not dependent on a 'specific' class of people anymore.
Difference 3: In the Old City States, the status of governing officials was based on wealth and power. In the new City States, the Kings had succession plans and power was inherited from father to son.
Similarity 1: Both city States were far from democracies and power was concentrated in the hands of a very few people.
Similarity 2: Most of the work was done by people who were basically poor. Either as farmers, peasants or slaves.
Similarity 3: Both cities were vulnerable during times of floods, droughts and natural disasters. They were eventually overrun by powerful nomads.
Answer:
Just doing this for the points
Explanation:
Bc i can
The Patriot Act was not needed by the government and was overblown and misused more often than not.
Explanation:
The Patriot Act out of many unconstitutional things it does, violates the fourth amendment which protects the people against unwarranted searching without any proper reason.
The law that was passed in the aftermath of the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center came as US wanted to increase home security and wanted to crack down on terrorists.
However, this law made itself a safeguard of Xenophobia.
many people were taken into custody and prisoners by the look of their skin and often persecuted for a long time before being set free.
Would have to look into the branches of government
