All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following are possible outcomes of rapid population growth?

Business

2 answers:

iren [92.7K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: Option (D) is correct.

Explanation:

When there is a rapid population growth in a country then this will results in a reduction in the human capital per worker, increase in technological knowledge and also reduction in capital per worker. There is a greater chance that counter-productive level will be reached.

The main problem arises from the rapid population growth is starvation and poverty. One of the devastating effects of the excess population is the scarcity of land. Land is limited in a country as a result more crops won't be produce. This will lead to raise the level of starvation.

tatyana61 [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: All of the above

Explanation: Rapid population growth can be defined as the excessive population in the world in relation to the resources present for use, this major problem has some serious economic consequences.

The given options can be explained as follows :-

A. Human capital refers to the specialized skills that human possess by use of education. Due to increase in population the value of skilled humans decreases as there will be a large number of skilled labor.

B. Due to population growth the number of worker will increase but the resources in use will remain same leading to less amount of share for each unit of labor force.

C. A rapid increase in population will lead to introduction of innovative minds to the world and thus technological advancement.

Therefor, we can conclude that option D is correct.

You might be interested in

Why is place mix regarded as an important element of marketing mix ? How does the consideration related to market have an impact

Paha777 [63]

Answer:

is d

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If the United States could produce five televisions per hour of labor and China could produce three televisions per hour of labo

IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.

Explanation:

Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.

Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)

China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.

However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.

7 0

3 years ago

Working capital can be defined as

DiKsa [7]

Answer:

A. current assets less current liabilities

I think this is answer

Explanation:

hope it help you

3 0

3 years ago

Blasterhoff, Inc. is a company that makes cannons for blasting off fireworks. In order to build their business they brought in a

Paha777 [63]

Answer:

The next step would be to take action on the discovered research

Explanation:

The company hired the marketing researcher so the first step which is taken by the researcher is to conduct research, fetch the data from the researched data which is already been carried out by them. After fetching the data, a plan is to be created which is also already been carried out. Then the next step after all this would to take action or put into action the plan or the discovered research.

7 0

3 years ago

Due to a recession, expected inflation this year is only 3.75%. However, the inflation rate in Year 2 and thereafter is expected

Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

5.25%

Explanation:

To calculate the inflation for the year 3, we will have to calculate the yield on 1 Year treasury bond.

The yield is calculated using the following formula:

Nominal Yield on Bond = Real risk free rate + Inflation for the year

Here

Inflation for Year One is 3.75%

Real Risk-Free Rate is 3.5%

Nominal yield on bond is Y for year 1

By putting values, we have:

Y = 3.5% + 3.75% = 7.25%

For 3 years treasury bond,

Nominal Yield on Treasury Bond for 3 years = Yield on year 1 + Inflation

Y3 = 7.25% + 1.5% = 8.75 %

Now if we deduct the real risk free rate from the 3 year yield on the treasury bond, then the resultant rate would be the inflation rate for the year 3.

Inflation Rate for Year 3 = Y3 - Real Risk-Free Rate

Inflation Rate for Year 3 = 8.75% - 3.5%

Inflation Rate for Year 3 = 5.25%

4 0

3 years ago