It was the growing power of Parliament, and several incompetent monarchs which led to this. By the 17th century, Parliament had gained one power that the monarchy no longer had - they were in charge of raising taxes. King Charles I got into so many arguments over money, religion and political affairs that his own Parliament declared war on him. In the end, Parliament won and had the king executed. Oliver Cromwell became the dictator of England for 10 years (this period is known as the Commonwealth), and abolished an increasingly corrupt Parliament. After his death, both the Monarchy and Parliament were restored, and king Charles II became King. The Civil War led to a gradual increase in Parliament's power, which may well have stopped the country from having a revolution.<span> </span>
Provide a rebuttal to a counterclaim, research relevant details to support their claim, make sure it has a mostly respectful tone, and mostly objective language.
So that there would be <span> single, and also a national system of hard money. Thats why :) hope this helps.</span>
Differing from his predecessors' classical divisions of monarchy,
aristocracy, and democracy, Montesquieu stated that there are two types of government which exists: the
sovereign and the administrative. He opined that the administrative powers were
divided into the executive, the judicial and the legislative, and that these
powers must <span>be separate from one another and dependent upon one
another. This idea is what has come to be known in modern times as <span>separation
of powers.</span></span>
