False, it only covers the other persons damages. That's what makes you "liable"
To find the percent of change, subtract to find the amount of change
387 - 207 = 180. The increase is 207.
Then divide the amount of change by the original amount
207 ÷ 180 = 1.15
Change the decimal to a percent, and multiply the number by 100:
1.15 X 100 = 115
The answer is 115%
Answer:
Use fx graph to draw this so u can see the graph easier
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: No, Titus is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation: Two shapes are <u>congruent</u> when they have the same size and shape, but one is created of rotation, reversion or translation of the other.
So, hexagons FEDCBA and F'E'D'C'B'A' are congruent because they have the same size and shape, however they are reversed and translated from each other, i.e.:
Comparing the coordinates of both hexagons:
F (-6,6) → F' (6, -4)
A (-10,6) → A' (10,-4)
E (-4,4) → E' (4, -6)
B (-12,4) → B' (12, -6)
D (-6,2) → D' (6, -8)
C (-10,2) → C' (10, -8)
We notice that the transformation necessary to transform FEDCBA into F'E'D'C'B'A' is
- multiply x-coordinate by (-1);
- subtract y-coordinate by 10;
Therefore, it is (x,y) → ( -x, y-10).
So, Titus is incorrect about the transformations that prove the hexagons are congruent.
Answer: The graph DOES represent a function.
Explanation: If you use a vertical line in the function and it only intersects once, that means it is a function. If it intersects twice, it is not a function.
See examples:
