In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1
You had the right idea using the Pythagorean theorem to solve for b.
Problem is for that triangle to work, the 5 and the 2√2 would have to switch places. The length of a leg cannot be larger than the length of the hypotenuse for it to truly be a right triangle.
Pythagorean theorem only works for the right triangles. Only way to "solve this problem would be to bring in complex numbers.
5² + b² = (2√2)²
25 + b² = 2²(√2)²
25 + b² = 4(2)
25 + b² = 8
b² = 8 - 25
b² = - 17
b = √-17
b= (√17i)
Then the problem with THIS is a measurement/distance cannot be negative... which goes against exactly what that complex number i is.
Answer:
The probability that a randomly selected passenger car gets more than 37.3 mpg is 0.1587.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the random variable <em>X</em> represent the miles-per-gallon rating of passenger cars.
It is provided that 
.
Compute the probability that a randomly selected passenger car gets more than 37.3 mpg as follows:
Thus, the probability that a randomly selected passenger car gets more than 37.3 mpg is 0.1587.
Answer:
x=-2.2 y=-1.6
Step-by-step explanation:
8x+y=-16
-3x+y=5
5x=-11
x=-11/5 or -2.2
-3x+y=5
-3(-2.2)+y=5
6.6+y=5
-6.6+y=-6.6
y=-1.6
Answer:
V≈226.19cm³
Step-by-step explanation:
