The division in charge of reestablishing the endangered species that are facing possible extinction is US Fish and Wildlife Service. The division monitor restocking of lakes with young fish for sports purposes. The division also regulate hunting activities via issuance of hunting licences.
Answer:
The cell membrane is the semipermeable membrane of a cell that surrounds and encloses its contents of cytoplasm and nucleoplasm.
Explanation:
<span>After
digestion, an amino acid not absorbed by the body and not used to build
proteins will first be subjected to removal from its amino group. If they are
not used for protein synthesis, amino acids becomes part of the metabolism
process. The body has the capability to create a subset of amino acids, also
known as non-essential amino acids because we don’t have requirement for them
in our diet. </span>
In place of clicking on the touchpad for the Cases, I would boost
in response to the visual incitements that would be linked with a reflex hammer
with an accelerometer; the reflex hammer would move appropriately to the carrying
of the picture on the screen by a programmed mechanical device. I wouldn’t use
the reflex hammer’s sound however; it’s purely there to compute my reaction
times (time of highest acceleration of movement of the reflex hammer deducted
by time of reflex) instead of using the computer’s software at figuring
reaction times, since I think the software is defective.
This case is about the school board cancelling a school play that the students believed they had the right to perform. The school board's defense is that the play was not approved by them, and that it was inappropriate. The students say that they have a right of performing what they want, since it's freedom of speech.
The Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier case was about a principal deleting pages of a school newspaper. The reason that it was deleted was because the principal deemed it inappropriate for younger viewers, and because he felt that the anonymity of the people they were writing about was not sufficient. Both cases deal about a school supposedly censoring students and limiting their freedom of speech.
The reason that the school board felt that they had a right of cancelling the play was because they would perform it on school grounds, therefore any inappropriate actions would deem the school liable. They have certain authority over what events can take place on their property.
The reason that the students felt they had a right of performing the play was because they felt that through the play, they express themselves. Censoring their expression would be limiting their speech.
I believe that the students should be allowed to perform the play depending on whether all of their parents approve of it. If there are people who say that it is too inappropriate, then it should be censored. There may be younger audiences in the play that would get the wrong impression from the play. First of all, anything that happens to the students on school grounds makes the school responsible. Secondly, the parents have a right of determining what they expose their children to. Third, considering that the play is a school play, the school board has a right to cancel or change any part of a play that they feel needs to be changed.
(This last part comes down to your personal opinion so you can change it if you'd like.) Yes the school should be allowed to censor the material of a school play or school newspaper because it is school related. Yes, the students have a right of expressing themselves, however others also do have rights. Censorship should be expressed only if they have the approval of the majority of the parents involved and of the teachers.