Which answer is correct
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
So if my ans was helpful u can follow me.
Answer:
The profit function is:
The maximum value is 406, 300 occurring when x = 640.
Step-by-step explanation:
The revenue function is:
And the cost function is:
Then the total profit function will be:
This is a quadratic function.
Therefore, the maximum value of the total profit will occur at its vertex point.
The vertex of a quadratic is given by:
In this case, a = -1, b = 1280, and c = -3300.
Then the point at which the maximum profit occurs is at:
And the maximum profit will be: