All categories

3 years ago

The tax rate of $.0815 in decimal can be expressed as _____ mills.

1 answer:

6 0

The tax rate of $.0815 in decimal can be expressed as 81.5 mills.
one mill is one thousandth of a currency unit, or 0.001$. So 0.0815 in mills means we have to divide 0.0815 by 0.001
0.0815/0.001 = 81.5

You might be interested in

The Duerr Company manufactures a single product. All raw materials used are traceable to specific units of product. Current info

Gemiola [76]

Answer:

Direct material used= $102,000

Cost of goods manufactured= $327,000

COGS= $347,000

Explanation:

First, we need to calculate the cost of direct material used:

Direct material used= beginning inventory + purchases - ending inventory

Direct material used= 28,000 + 105,000 - 31,000

Direct material used= $102,000

Now, the cost of goods manufactured:

cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials used + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP

cost of goods manufactured= 40,000 + 102,000 + 130,000 + 105,000 - 50,000

cost of goods manufactured= $327,000

Finally, the cost of goods sold:

COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured - ending finished inventory

COGS= 80,000 + 327,000 - 60,000

COGS= $347,000

6 0

3 years ago

In a Cobb–Douglas production function the marginal product of labor will increase if:

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

Option "B" is the correct answer to the following statement.

Explanation:

The rise in the labor workforce would raise the productive output of capital in a specific Cobb – Douglas output method, and it will raise the actual rental price of resources.

The gross amount of capital would also rise in the output of Cobb-Douglas if the volume of labor grows.

Under this function, human capital will help in the production of the product, human capital and marginal production are directly proportionate to each other.

3 0

3 years ago

For financial accounting purposes, what is the total amount of product costs incurred to make 24,500 units

Anna71 [15]

Answer:

The product cost for 24,500 units is $497,350.

Explanation:

The reason is that the the product cost always includes all the variable production cost and specific fixed production cost. In this scenario, direct material cost, direct labor cost, variable manufacturing overhead cost are variable production cost whereas the fixed manufacturing cost is specific fixed production cost which will form part of product cost. The remainder of the cost left is period cost.

Direct materials (24,500 * $7.7 per unit) $188,650

Direct labor (24,500 * $4.7 per unit) $115,150

Variable manufacturing overhead (24,500 * $2.2 per unit) $53,900

Fixed manufacturing overhead (24,500 * $5.7 per unit) $139,650

Total product costs $497,350

7 0

3 years ago

Problem 10A specialty coffeehouse sells Colombian coffee at a fairly steady rate of 280 pounds annually. The beans are purchased

SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

The computations are shown below:

Explanation:

a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:

$= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{Annual demand}\times \text{Ordering cost}}{\text{Carrying cost}}}$

$= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{280}\times \text{\$45}}{\text{\$0.48}}}$

= 229 units

The carrying cost is come from

= $2.40 × 20%

b. Time between placement of orders is

= Economic order quantity ÷Annual demand

= 229 ÷ 280

= 0.8179 years

So,

= 0.8179 × 365 days

= 298.53 days

We assume 365 days in a year

c. The average annual cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to

= Holding cost + ordering cost

= (Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × Holding cost) + (Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost)

= (229 units ÷ 2 × $0.48) + (280 ÷ 229 units × $45)

= $54.96 + $55.02

= $109.98

d) Now the reorder level is

= Demand × lead time + safety stock

where, Demand equal to

= Expected demand ÷ total number of weeks in a year

= 280 pounds ÷ 52 weeks

= 5.38461

So, the reorder point would be

= 5.38461 × 3 + $0

= 16.15 pounds

7 0

3 years ago

Detroit Corporation sued Chicago Corporation for intentional damage to Detroit's goodwill. Detroit had created its goodwill thro

Grace [21]

Answer:

d. The $1,500,000 is not taxable because Detroit settled the case

Explanation:

The $1,500,000 is not taxable because Detroit settled the case, Compensation received of damaging Goodwill is not taxable.

8 0

3 years ago