This question is mainly about YOUR opinion. Many will say that it will, but some will say it shouldn't. This is based entirely on your opinion.
Answer:
C. MACRS depreciation expense.
Explanation:
Material participation in an income-producing activity. That is, an activity that is regular, continuous, and substantial leading to income-producing actions, in which the taxpayer materially participates is an active income or loss.
Answer:
an economic system blending elements of market economies with elements of planned economies, free markets with state interventionism, or private enterprise with public enterprise.
Explanation:
HAHAHA
Answer:
20.1%
Explanation:
The computation of the simple rate of return is shown below;
= (operating cost - depreciation) ÷ (purchase of new machine - scrap value)
= ($145,500 - $50,500) ÷ ($505,000 - $35,000)
= ($94,500) ÷ ($470,000)
= 20.1%
hence, the simple rate of return is 20.1%
The same would be considered and relevant
Answer:
How much may Adrian deduct?
This depends on whether the museum is private or not. If the museum belongs to a public charity or a university, then Adrian can deduct full fair market value = $35,000. Since Adrian's AGI is $80,000, she could donate up to $40,000 (half her AGI).
But if the museum is a private organization, then Adrian can deduct only her basis in the vase = $15,000
How would your answer to Part a change if, instead of displaying the vase, the museum sold the vase to an antique dealer?
Once you donate artwork, unless you strict prohibit the museum from selling it, then they can sell it and you cannot do anything about it. Some donors specific certain terms for their donations, e.g. artwork cannot be sold and it must be exhibited at least a certain amount of time, in certain places, etc. But if Adrian didn't include any clause on her donation, then whatever happens to the vase is up to the museum.
Currently, museums are less likely to accept restricted donations, unless of course the artwork is worth it.
