Answer:
They were forced to move out from their ancestral land.
Explanation:
The American-Indian war occurred because the government of the settlers wanted to take ownership over the resources that resided Within the Native's ancestral land.
Since the land was tied to their ancestral history and cultural origin, the Native refuse to give it. So, both parties engaged in the battle.
The technological advancement that's possessed by the settlers made the tide of war turn in their favor. As a result, the native Americans were forcefully removed from their home and scattered all across North America.
Answer:
1) A jury hears arguments during a trial. (2) The defendant may appeal the verdict.
Explanation:
<em>Many incidents are chosen for an "oral argument" ere the forum. Oral reasons in the courtyard of requests is a structured conversation amongst the appellate advocates and the committee of justices concentrating on the constitutional laws in conflict. Each side is given a small time — normally about 15 minutes — to give reasoning to the court.</em>
Throughout America, the number of participants in choirs has increased where more than 42.6 million individuals (both adults and children combined) are now considered to be part of some choral group.
There are more than 270,000 choral groups all across America (in 2009, as per the study). This participation is far more than any other performing arts.
1 in 6 Americans (above 18) sings in a chorus.
In 2009, the percentage has increased from 14% to 17%.
This information is taken from The Chorus Impact Study of 2009 which can be referred to for further details on Choral Singing and its impact on American life.
The study also examines the effect of choral singing on children and their development along with many other social aspects.
brainly.com/question/17640146
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
