All categories

3 years ago

Which statement describes an opportunity cost that could result from the government regulating businesses?

1 answer:

5 0

The best answer is C) Government regulations can lead to an increase in production costs.

One opportunity cost of government regulation is the fact that government regulation often causes companies to change their production in ways that make it less efficient and more costly, although the idea that the benefits to society outweigh these costs.
<span>
A) is not negative and not necessarily an effect of regulation
B) is not negative</span>

You might be interested in

If a company receives $12,000 from the stockholders to establish a corporation, the effect on the accounting equation would be:_

Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is option A

Explanation:

A receipt of cash indicates an increase in cash which is an asset. When an asset increases, it is represented by a debit to that asset's account and the asset side of the accounting equation is also debited. Thus, a receipt of $12000 cash from stockholders will be represented by a debit or an increase to the asset account for $12000.

The other side of the transaction would be a credit to the equity for $12000 because the stockholders are the owners of the company and any capital invested by the owners in the company is represented by a credit to the equity account as the capital is credited when it increases. Thus, the effect on accounting equation will be an increase in the equity of $12000.

4 0

2 years ago

The profit and loss statement of Kitsch Ltd., an S corporation, shows $100,000 book income. Kitsch is owned equally by four shar

postnew [5]

Answer:

$82000
$20500
$750
Not taxable

Explanation:

with the information provided

A) how the entity's non separately stated income is $82000

to calculate the non separately stated income

(Total long term stated income) - (total short term stated income)

long term stated income

book value = $100000

long term capital loss/gain = $6000

book value + long term capital loss = $106000 ( total long term stated income )

short term stated income

tax exempt = $3000

dividends = $9000

1231 gain = $7000

net passive income = $5000

total short term stated income = 3000 + 9000 + 7000 + 5000 = $24000

hence non separately stated income = $106000 - $24000 = $82000

B) To show how one of he kitsch shareholder is bearing $205000 income or loss

Number of shareholder = 4

non separately stated income = $82000

non separately stated income / number of shareholder = 82000 / 4 =$20500

Tax exempt income = $3000

number of share holders = 4

hence Billings' share of tax exempt interest income = tax exempt income / number of share holders

= $3000 / 4 = $750

Billings income is not taxable this year because his taxable income this year is $20500

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Assume a purely competitive increasing-cost industry is initially in long-run equilibrium and that an increase in consumer deman

Aliun [14]

The price of the product will increase and then the quantity of the output will also be more than the original one.

<u>Explanation:</u>

In a market which is purely competitive, with the increase in the demand of the particular good in the market, the price of the good will also increase because of the increase in the demand by the consumers. After making the adjustments, the quantity will therefore also increase of the output than the original one.

4 0

3 years ago

The Purchase and sales agreement provides for release of earnest money to the seller after the buyer's property inspection. The

Papessa [141]

The broker should refuse to release the earnest money even after the seller requested the earnest money prior to the property inspection.

<h3>What is earnest money?</h3>

Earnest money refers to the deposit paid by a buyer to a seller, reflecting the good faith of a buyer in purchasing a home.

It is the money paid to a merchant or seller to complete a contract or money paid to a merchant / seller to show good faith in the transaction.

Hence, the broker should refuse to release the earnest money even after the seller requested the earnest money prior to the property inspection.

Learn more about earnest money here : brainly.com/question/14342438

6 0

2 years ago

A. Given the historical cost of product Z is $20, the selling price of product Z is $25, costs to sell product Z are $3, the rep

Vlada [557]

Answer:

c. $21

b. $20

Explanation:

In lower-of-cost-or-market comparison, the cost of the product and the realizable value of the product are compared and lower is used to value the available inventory.

In the given Scenario the realizable value of product Z is the recoverable value of the product.

Hence The replacement value of $21 should be used in the lower-of-cost-or-market comparison.

Calculate the net recoverable value for the product Z

Net recoverable value = Selling price of product Z - Cost to sell product Z

Net recoverable value = $25 - $3 = $22

Now by comparing the cost and net realizable value the lower value is cost of $20.

Hence $20 will be used in order to value the inventory.

6 0

2 years ago