1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
3 years ago
13

Which sentence uses periods correctly?

History
2 answers:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
8 0
D, because it's a full sentence.
goldenfox [79]3 years ago
3 0
Yeah it's D because it's a full sentence

You might be interested in
5 achievements Norman manley gained in the government huh​
OLga [1]

Answer:

  • In 1932 Norman Manley was made King’s Counsel
  • The Howard University conferred on him the honorary degree of Doctor of Law in 1946.
  • He was voted a life member of the Congress of International Organisations by the United Transport Service Employees in Chicago .
  • A speech made by Manley at the National Press Club in Washington was published in the Congressional Record.
  • In 1961 he was made an honorary citizen of Kansas City , Missouri.

6 0
2 years ago
What was the 1st french settlement and how did it make money?
AnnyKZ [126]
It made mney throguh shipping and trade

8 0
3 years ago
The voyage of slaves from Africa to America became known as?
bixtya [17]
Middle passage is the answer................
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following individuals can become a naturalized citizen?
Pie
Generally speaking, it would be "<span>B. Anyone born outside the United States to parents who are both citizens of the United States," since location is less important than family in many cases. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What year was the holocaust?<br><br> (sorry can't spell at the moment)
    8·1 answer
  • Who established rule by assembly and people's courts with juries in Athens?
    15·2 answers
  • What legislative act gave the US government power to divide up reservations into family plots?
    10·1 answer
  • I am a farmer with 2 kids and a wife trying to go from home to the oregon trail this is my journal entry please what else should
    5·1 answer
  • In the area of immigration, there are two factors that contribute to people leaving their countries for other ones. Which factor
    9·2 answers
  • Which action by the US War Department angered Chief Red Cloud to the point that he refused to sign the Treaty of Fort Laramie ?
    6·2 answers
  • Did andrew johnson want to reunite the union together?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did people domesticate plants during the Neolithic era? to adapt to the climate to prevent soil erosion to create a reliable
    14·2 answers
  • What office analyzes the federal budget to report to the Appropriations Committee
    12·2 answers
  • How were slaves in Sparta different from slaves in Athens?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!