Answer:
(0,0), (1,1), (2,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
When testing to find possible points in situations like this, I always start by testing with the origin point (0,0).
In this case:
4x+6y<24 ==> 0 + 0 < 24 TRUE, it satisfies the inequality.
We then try with (1,1):
4x+6y<24 ==> 4 + 6 < 24 TRUE, it satisfies the inequality.
And with (2,2):
4x+6y<24 ==> 8 + 12 < 24 TRUE, it satisfies the inequality.
Answer:
wouldn't that just be -35?
Step-by-step explanation:
you just have to do -29-6
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is

Answer:
$8.2
Step-by-step explanation:
The final price of the coat = $45 -0.2 * $45 = $36
The final price of the suit = $95 − 0.3 * $95 = $66.5
sarosh's commission = 0.08 * ( $36 + $66 ) = $8.2
<span>0.888 = 888 / 1000
hope that helps</span>