Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer: Controlling
Explanation:
Controlling is a management process which involves comparing the outcome of an organization's processes to the targets set for those processes beforehand, and taking corrective measures in case the outcome is deviating from the set targets. For example, a manager of a business running at a loss, can identify the cause of the loss and find ways of correcting the negative outcome.
Answer:
Option B Strategic Plan
Explanation:
The reason is that the organization strategic plan has a greater impact in formulation of marketing strategy and its execution. Strategic plan are more useful than the pestle analysis because strategic options are formulated by reviewing the SWOT, PESTLE and other information such as mission, etc. The strategic option choosed is our strategic plan so for the best results all we want is strategic plan to formulate marketing strategy.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Here, in this question, we are asked to determine the decrease in notes payable that peachtree should record in the first year.
To determine this, we proceed as follows;
Interest payment for the first year = 30000*7% i.e 2100
Principal amount paid = Total amount paid - Interest amount
= 7317 -2100 i.e 5217
Notes payable should be reduced by 5217
