A bill of attainder
two thirds the house wants it
James maddison
The answer is: When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.
This happen because the student's argument is extremely influenced by whether they could be involved in the comprehensive exam.
If the exam would be implemented in the following year, the students are very likely to face the exam themselves. This make them much more likely to have negative attitudes toward the idea.
If the exam would be implemented in the next 10 years, the students wouldn't have to face it. Therefore, their attitude would be less negative toward the comprehensive exam.
Answer:
B. The large glass has more heat than the small glass.
Explanation:
This is true because think about it, if you have a container filled up with water, then you need more water to fill it up at the same level (like 1 inch below the top of the container) than you will need for a smaller container.
It's the same technique that you will have to understand to get the answer for this problem...
So hence, your answer is B. The large glass has more heat than the small glass.
Answer:
Large molecules do not pass through the BBB easily. Low lipid (fat) soluble molecules do not penetrate into the brain. However, lipid soluble molecules, such as barbituate drugs, rapidly cross through into the brain. Molecules that have a high electrical charge are slowed.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
