in <u>naturalistic observation </u> the researcher spends extensive time with respondents and carefully records their activities, conversations, gestures, and other aspects of everyday life.
<h3>What is naturalistic observation..??</h3>
Naturalistic observation is a research method that involves observing subjects in their natural environment. The goal is to look at behavior in a natural setting without intervention, it is a qualitative research method where you record the behaviors of your research subjects in real world settings.
'Naturalistic research is important for getting research results that aren't impacted by the researchers themselves. Even a well designed study can have problems with subjects being aware of observation, or being in an unnatural environment, which could skew results."
To know more about naturalistic observation click below:
brainly.com/question/14633951
#SPJ4
Answer:
-susceptible to the misinformation effect?
How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?
Explanation:
Misinformation effect: In psychology, the term "misinformation effect" is described as the propensity for "post-event information" to interfere or interrupt the memory of a person of the actual or original event. According to researchers, the introduction of relatively precise information that follows an event can possess a "dramatic effect" on how a person remembers.
Cause: The "misinformation effect" happen when an individual's recall of "episodic memories" becomes less or slightly accurate due to post-event information.
The answer would be an opportunity cost
Example of opportunity cost :
Let's say an artist have 2 choices for their Friday's schedule. The first one is to do a free meet and greet with his fans. The second one is to serve as a Guest star on a tv show, in whcih he will receive a payment.
Then, the artist chose to do the meet and greet instead.
The amount of money that the artist lost from his decision, is an example of an opportunity cost
Hope this help you out
<span />
Answer:
Ended up with way more people then the confederate. If Frassanito's claims are true, what do they suggest about Gardner's Gettysburg photographs? If Frassanito's claims are true that would mean that Gardner lied about probably most of his pictures he took at Gettysburg.
Explanation:
