Answer:
Since a/2⁽ⁿ ⁺ ¹⁾b < a/2ⁿb, we cannot find a smallest positive rational number because there would always be a number smaller than that number if it were divided by half.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let a/b be the rational number in its simplest form. If we divide a/b by 2, we get another rational number a/2b. a/2b < a/b. If we divide a/2b we have a/2b ÷ 2 = a/4b = a/2²b. So, for a given rational number a/b divided by 2, n times, we have our new number c = a/2ⁿb where n ≥ 1
Since = a/(2^∞)b = a/b × 1/∞ = a/b × 0 = 0, the sequence converges.
Now for each successive division by 2, a/2⁽ⁿ ⁺ ¹⁾b < a/2ⁿb and
a/2⁽ⁿ ⁺ ¹⁾b/a/2ⁿb = 1/2, so the next number is always half the previous number.
So, we cannot find a smallest positive rational number because there would always be a number smaller than that number if it were divided by half.
Answer:
Um so idk the process but yes it can be found :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
240
Step-by-step explanation:
20/0.25 = 80
80 x 3 = 240
Answer: He could have played more than 3 games.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, to answer this question we have to write an inequality.
I golf club charges $10 to join and $5 per game: So, the cost of playing golf is equal to $10 (joining price) plus the product of the number of games played (x) and the price per game (5).
That expression must be higher than 25, since john paid more than $25.
Mathematically speaking
10+ 5 x > 25
Solving for x
5x >25-10
5x >15
x >15/5
x> 3
He could have played more than 3 games, since his cost was higher ( not equal or higher) than 25.
Answer:
x=111
Step-by-step explanation:
the supplementary angle is 16. triangles should add up to 180.