The answer to the question above is "no, the business is not optimizing" according to the information shown on the question above. In this situation, we have the greater marginal revenue (4=8*(1-1/2)) than the marginal cost (0)and the business is not in its full capacity. The parking lot business can increase its marginal cost to achieve its full capacity to gain more profit.
Answer:
A) Joint Venture
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that in this context, Cream Bite Inc. is a Joint Venture. This is a business term that refers to an arrangement between two parties in which both combine their resources in order to meet an agreed upon goal in a more efficient manner and in a much smaller time-frame than if they were to do it separately.
Answer: a. Gardening gloves
b. Terracotta planters
c. Garden scissors
d. Watering cans
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Helga runs a website on which she sells houseplants and that she also earns through pay-per-click advertising that allows search engines to show targeted ads on her site.
All the products will be advertised on her website. The gardening gloves, terracotta planters, garden scissors and the watering cans are all materials that are required for plant growth to provide water and keep weeds away.
Answer:
Your answer is going to be c.
Explanation:
as soap is meant to wash away germs it has to first kill them.
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
