Answer:

And for the new case we know that the sales increase by a factor of 2%, so then we can find the new number of sales like this:

And the Total August sales would be given by:

And the correct answer for this case would be:
$63,750
Explanation:
For this case the original number of sales for this case is 5000 units and the unitary price is given by 
And the total sales for the original case would be given by:

And for the new case we know that the sales increase by a factor of 2%, so then we can find the new number of sales like this:

And the Total August sales would be given by:

And the correct answer for this case would be:
$63,750
A reduction in retained earnings of $2,950,000.
$37(500,000 x .14) = &2,590,000
Answer:
Correct answer is False for economic decision making, when the inputs and outputs are fixed, the criterion to use is minimize the input
Since, both input and output are fixed, the input can’t be decreased. Each of them has to be fixed in directive to vary the association among them. (It can be fixed contribution, or fixed production or neither one of them is fixed)
The correct answer is B.) The problem of scarcity does not exist.
Because since it is a 'perfectly competitive' market then scarcity shouldnt exist.
-Autumn Leaves
Answer:
$103,400
Explanation:
Does Manuel have any certainties that Nolan will purchase more than 30,000 units during the year? Apparently, according to historic sales, Nolan purchases at least 40,000 units per year, so Manuel should consider that Nolan will again purchase a similar amount this year and therefore, will be entitled to a rebate.
Another issue that must be considered is that 30,000 units / 4 quarters = 7,500 units per quarter, and Nolan clearly purchased more than that.
A rebate is not a discount, it happens when the seller offers a certain amount of goods to a buyer without cost because the buyer purchased more than an specific amount. It is basically an incentive or prize that Manuel gives Nolan for being a good client.
Manuel should recognize $110,000 x (1 - 6%) = $103,400 in revenues