1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anton [14]
3 years ago
11

Which group of people was the most negatively affected by the outcome of the War of 1812?

History
2 answers:
Ann [662]3 years ago
4 0
It was the "Federalists" who were <span>the most negatively affected by the outcome of the War of 1812, since they had been very much against the war which turned out to be a success for the US. </span>
nordsb [41]3 years ago
4 0

the native americans or indians

You might be interested in
Which delegates opposed the mention of slavery in the declaration of independence?
djverab [1.8K]
Ur mom is the declaration of independence and thag id the right answer thomas bebberdon
4 0
3 years ago
I NEED HELP (Again)
bezimeni [28]

B. growth in commerce and trade

7 0
3 years ago
Hey y'all I just really need help with this question so if y'all didn't mind and try to help me that would be greatHELP ME PLEAS
zzz [600]
The development of a written language in ancient Egypt allowed for a society to form where people could much easier communicate and pass on information, allowing for more trading, information, etc
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the roles of the
Yuri [45]

Answer:

The fur trade was a vast commercial enterprise across the wild, forested expanse of what is now Canada. It was at its peak for nearly 250 years, from the early 17th to the mid-19th centuries. It was sustained primarily by the trapping of beavers to satisfy the European demand for felt hats. The intensely competitive trade opened the continent to exploration and settlement. It financed missionary work, established social, economic and colonial relationships between Europeans and Indigenous people, and played a formative role in the creation and development of Canada.

(This is the full-length entry about the fur trade. For a plain-language summary, please see Fur Trade in Canada (Plain Language Summary).)

Beaver

Beaver

(© Mirage3/Dreamstime)

Fishing, Furs and Christianity: Early Euro-Indigenous Relations (1608–63)

The fur trade began as an adjunct to the fishing industry. Early in the 16th century, fishermen from northwest Europe were taking rich catches of cod on the Grand Banks off Newfoundland and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Drying their fish onshore took several weeks. During that time, good relations had to be maintained with Indigenous people, who were eager to obtain metal and cloth goods from the Europeans. What they had to offer in exchange were furs and fresh meat. The fishermen found an eager and profitable market in Europe for the furs.

When the wide-brimmed felt hat came into fashion later in the 16th century, the demand for beaver pelts increased tremendously. The best material for hat felt was the soft underfur of the beaver. Its strands have tiny barbs that make them mat together tightly.

To exploit the trade more effectively, the first French traders established permanent shore bases in Acadia, a post at Tadoussac. They also founded a base at Quebec in 1608. The following year, the Dutch began trading up the Hudson River. In 1614, they established permanent trading posts at Manhattan and upriver at Orange (now Albany, New York). This activity marked the beginning of an intense rivalry between the two commercial empires of the Dutch and the French. It also involved their respective Indigenous allies, the Huron-Wendat and the Haudenosaunee, both of whom were supplied with guns by their European allies. (See also: Indigenous-French Relations.)

Indigenous peoples were important partners in this growing fur trade economy. From roughly 1600 to 1650, the French forged alliances of kinship and trade with the Huron-Wendat, Algonquin and Innu. These peoples helped the French collect and process beaver furs and distribute them to other Indigenous groups throughout their vast trade network, which was established well before the arrival of Europeans. The fur trade provided Indigenous peoples with European goods that they could use for gift-giving ceremonies, to improve their social status and to go to war. The French forged military alliances with their Indigenous allies in order to maintain good trade and social relations. In the 17th century, the French fought against the Haudenosaunee in the struggle for control over resources. This was known as the Beaver Wars or the French and Iroquois Wars.

During the first half of the 17th century, the number of traders flooding into the St. Lawrence River region, and cutthroat competition among them, greatly reduced profits. In an attempt to impose order, the French Crown granted monopolies of the trade to certain individuals. In return, the monopoly holders had to maintain French claims to the new lands and assist in the attempts of the Roman Catholic Church to convert Indigenous people to Christianity.

In 1627, Cardinal Richelieu, first minister of Louis XIII, organized the Compagnie des Cent-Associés to put French territorial claims and the missionary drive on a firmer footing. Four Récollets missionaries were sent to Québec in 1615. They were followed in 1625 by the first members of the powerful Society of Jesus (Jesuits). A mission base, Ste Marie Among the Hurons, was established among the Huron-Wendat near Georgian Bay. However, the Huron-Wendat were more interested in the trade goods of the French than in their religion. And it was fur-trade profits that sustained the missionaries and allowed the company to send hundreds of settlers to the colony. In 1642, Ville-Marie (now Montreal) was founded as a mission centre. In 1645, the company ceded control of the fur trade and the colony’s administration to the colonists. (See also: Communauté des habitants.) Unfortunately, they proved to be inept administrators, and fur-trade returns fluctuated wildly. Finally, after a desperate appeal by the colonial authorities to Louis XIV, the Crown took over the colony in 1663.

4 0
3 years ago
22 POINTS PLS HELP
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

Central Africa

Explanation:

Because the area isn’t as dry and has an abundance of soil/dirt.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What type of democracy has people electing representatives who voted for the people's interest
    5·1 answer
  • President Reagan supported research on a system of orbiting satellites that would intercept and destroy enemy missiles with lase
    5·1 answer
  • Explain some of the factors caused people to move west.Explain some of the factors caused people to move west.
    9·1 answer
  • Samuel Morse helped spark a revolution in communications. Mark the statement if it describes one of Morse's contributions. A. He
    7·2 answers
  • Give one reason Andrew Jackson should not be on the money.
    11·1 answer
  • Referring to the image of the evening world what level of importance can you assign to the story of the new haven wreck
    15·1 answer
  • Which type of colony was governed directly by the British king and paraliment?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was following washington a challenge for president Adam?
    14·1 answer
  • What was McCarthy investigated for (senator)
    14·1 answer
  • C. Explain ONE way in which Renaissance ideals influenced the Protestant Reformation in the period 1450-1750.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!