Answer: (d) liability - refundable deposits.
Explanation:
The refundable deposit of $1,000 was a liability because Growler owed it to the customer and were simply holding it for when the customer returned the equipment.
Upon receipt of the deposit, they credited the Refundable deposits accounts which is a liability account. Now that the customer has returned the cleaning equipment and the deposit is to be refunded to the customer, Growler should now debit the Refundable deposits account to cancel out the liability.
Answer:
Inductive reasoning
Explanation:
This type of reasoning is considering generalization that is formed and based on some previous experiences and with that previous experiences the observation that is made is forming an inductive reasoning.
In this case, the person met many of them who says that their favorite pizza is pepperoni and then every time that someone say that they love pizza, this person will think of pepperoni pizza because of the previous experiences that caused those observations.
Answer and Explanation:
The ethical issues that occurs in the case when a corporate insider wants to purchase or sells in the firm where an individual works are as follows:
1. The information could be misuse
2. It would become unfair for the investors
3. The trust could be broke also it would create the discrimination with the other investors
4. The insider trading lowers the size of the market that ultimately decrease the volatility of the market
In measuring an impairment loss for a financial asset under U.S. GAAP and under IFRS, the carrying value of the financial asset would be compared to:
under U.S. GAAP Fair value and under IFRS recoverable amount.
Explanation:
In US GAAP, the cost of financial asset depreciation is calculated as the difference between carried value and fair value; in compliance with IFRS, a loss of financial asset impairment is defined as the difference between carrying value and the percentage of the asset that can be recouped.
In compliance with US-based ASC 360-10-35-20. The recovery of a historically identified impairment loss (or "restoration") is forbidden because an item is deemed to have a new cost base after an impairment loss has been registered.
