Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
HEY THERE BREZZY! HOW YA DOIN
THE ANSWER IS: <span>revivalsRevivals were religious meetings that increased people's interest in religion. Religious revivals took place throughout the United States
HOPE IT HELPS!</span>
Answer:
Large industrial prisons
Explanation:Large industrial prisons - it is considered to be the military complex that is under by private agencies for profit. The contract of Large industrial prisons is held to provide the cheap labor at the prison, surveillance technology, food services or any other facilities at prison.
This is considered to be the new trend in some parts of America in which prison is handled by private agencies to make some profit.
The hypothesis that the RSA Animate video offers as to why we often avoid explicit language is that indirect language creates individual knowledge, while explicit language creates mutual knowledge that we cannot take back.
Uttering explicit language can be a determinant of a person’s first impression towards the speaker.
Bill and Madison should be prepare a sterilization step for their hands before moving on to a new examination. In this way, they don't have to worry about using gloves to make sure that the examination is sterile. Hot water, soap and alcohol will be enough.
