What document is created by a society to define and organize its government

2 answers:

5 0

The document that's created by a society to define and organize its government is called a social contract and the constitution. In both, you define how the government looks like and what the government will do in order to ensure the society to function normally.

Phoenix [80]3 years ago

5 0

I believe the answer is: Constitution

Constitution is made as the core standard for government to create its program no matter who hold the presidency.

Even if in the future the government would make new legislation, the content of legislation cannot violate/contradict the rules that written in the constitution,

You might be interested in

What is the term used for the formal accusation of misconduct against a public official?

Vladimir79 [104]

The term that the definition refers to is impeachment. Impeachment is usually done by a legislative body, who will charge an elected government official with a crime. When someone is impeached, the legislative body of the government would run a vote that would determine whether the individual would be removed from office or not.

Some recent cases where head of governments were impeached in their country, was in South Korea, where former President Park Geun-hye was impeached and imprisoned for 24 years due to influence peddling; and in Brazil, where former President Dilma Roussef was impeached due to administrative misconduct and disregard of federal budget.

7 0

3 years ago

¿ Por qué las normas religiosas y morales no son coercibles?

kumpel [21]

Explanation:

translation = Why are religious and moral norms not coercible?

The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific investigations have failed to decompose “religion” and “morality” into theoretically grounded elements; have adopted parochial conceptions of key concepts—in particular, sanitized conceptions of “prosocial” behavior; and have neglected to consider the complex interplay between cognition and culture. We argue that to make progress, the categories “religion” and “morality” must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. We adopt this fractionating strategy, setting out an encompassing evolutionary framework within which to situate and evaluate relevant evidence. Our goals are twofold: to produce a detailed picture of the current state of the field, and to provide a road map for future research on the relationship between religion and morality.