1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
3 years ago
6

List three ways in which the expeditions were similar

History
1 answer:
AysviL [449]3 years ago
6 0

All the expeditions were because their country's needed to find new land to conquer. They all were after more land so they could have power over the people that lived there. They also had expeditions to discover new places and to study the world.

You might be interested in
1. When did they open the London underground?
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

January 10, 1863

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The history of the world is filled with stories of people migrating. Migration is the movement of people from one place to anoth
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

A) The Spanish Settlers.

Explanation:

The invasion of the North American continent and its peoples began with the Spanish in 1565 at St. Augustine, Florida.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What did southern slave holders in the early seventeenth century argue as a positive reason for the institution of slavery?
lawyer [7]

Answer:

that they had different opinions

Explanation:

they thought differently so they were arguing about their different opinions

3 0
3 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
Briefly describe the ties between the south and and American Indians in Indian territory that impacted which side American India
devlian [24]

Answer:

give me a minute to research

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What country did Isaac Newton
    15·2 answers
  • 1. In what way was the Nazi- Soviet Pact similar to the treaty that created the Axis? that is the 1st question. i will give all
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Washington advance on Yorktown?
    13·1 answer
  • Who has the power to veto bills Executive Branch Legislative Branch Judicial Branch
    6·2 answers
  • Are other nations responsible to stop genocides
    5·2 answers
  • What do globalization,immigration and migration have in common
    13·1 answer
  • Which state was admitted to the union as a slave state along with the promise that the Louisiana territory remain free
    14·1 answer
  • Kerajaan alam melayu yang menggunakan tulisan palava?​
    5·1 answer
  • How did moishe the beadle change?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the most accurate statement about the United States' involvement in World War I ?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!