not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
<em>Hey There!!</em>
<em>I think the best answer is:</em>
<em>C. </em><em>Both regions exported mostly food products.</em>
<em>Because, They grew crops such as wheat, oats and barley. Similar to New England colonies, the Middle colonies also flourished in trade of major items like iron and furs. When comparing both New England and Middle Colonies, both utilized forms of self-government.</em>
<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this wrong....</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em />
<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
Answer:
Distribution.
Explanation:
Social intelligence system or social media intelligence is the gateway to understand, translate, and analyse the information and to take this information to the next level make better and beneficial decisions. It is divided into four levels namely, social listening, data management, advanced analytics, and distribution.
Distribution<u> is the last level in the social media intelligence. This helps in defining the insights across the business. There are several distribution methods such as APIs, reports, alerts, etc. These methods help the organisation to consume the information and updates of online conversation. </u>
So, the correct answer is distribution.
Answer: i want a good day :)
Explanation:
The answer would be the id. This is the identity part made up of oblivious clairvoyant vitality that attempts to fulfill fundamental urges, needs, and wants. Likewise, it works in light of the joy standard, which requests quick satisfaction of necessities.
