Answer:
22.98%
Explanation:
Here, the current entry means the ratio between the long term debt and the total assets
In mathematically,
= Long term debt ÷ total assets
where,
Total assets = Account receivable + cash + inventories + net fixed assets
= $397,400 + $47,500 + $288,000 + $999,000
= $1,731,900
And, the long term debt is $398,024
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $398,024 ÷ $1,731,900
= 22.98%
Answer:
a curved line; diminishing marginal returns
Explanation:
The specific factor model is one that assumes that a country produces two goods using two factors of production in a perfectly competitive market. That is labour and and capital.
The production possibility frontier is defined as the maximum combination of two products that can be produced by a country. The PPF tends to be curved because of the law of diminishing returns. As more of one factor of production is added it will result in reduced output of the product over time.
After you open your new business is not the best time to conduct research on your product.
During this time, it's best for you to allocate your resources to make improvement to your products and build a loyal consumer base
hope this helps
Answer:
a. is often not in the best interest of society.
Explanation:
A monopoly is when there is a single firm operating in an industry. This is usually so because of high barriers to entry of other firms.
Because a monopoly has only one firm in the industry, the firm sets prices to maximise profit. The firm earns economic profit in the short and long run.
The monopoly benefits the producer more than consumers. It is often inefficient and fails to maximise total welfare .
Because of these inefficiencies, government usually steps in to regulate the activities of a monopoly.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
